It was <2014-05-27 wto 17:50>, when Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC) wrote: > Le 23/05/2014 14:33, José Bollo a écrit : >> Hi all, >> >> I just finished the wiki page that describes SAPI, the Secure CAPI, >> proposal: https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/Security/SAPI [...] > I would prefer to see the attribution of the Admin user to be done via > a privilege table in Buxton rather than in a group because it would > allow to propagate the information in the system without requiring for > the new promoted user to relog.
Without "relogging" kernel won't acknowledge new permissions beaceuse user processes won't have new GID on their list of supplementary groups as set by setgroups(2). It's OK to put this information in a Buxton table as long as we do not relay on kernel DAC. -- Łukasz Stelmach Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
pgpc25odERsfB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
