Hi Alexander,
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Kanevskiy, Alexander < [email protected]> wrote: > On 04/06/14 18:29 , "Vitaly Chernooky" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > How do you usually deal with cyclic dependency? > > break it, refactor it. It really depends on each specific case. > It is not a generic question but about few well-known cyclic dependency especially in Tizen (3.0) > And why it is not solved in common ways? > > Usually those should not be created in proper designed modular software. :) > However reality is far from that, if there is opportunity to develop > components independently using some “assumed” build dependencies – people > do design mistakes and create cycles. > Before I had deal with many Linux-based distros, but Tizen is first where cyclic dependency was not solved on early stages. \\wbr Vitaly > \\wbr Vitaly > > > -- > Best regards, Alexander Kanevskiy. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Intel Finland Oy > Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki > Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4 > Domiciled in Helsinki > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
