On Thu, 2014-07-03 at 19:28 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On 07/03/2014 06:58 PM, Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC) wrote: > > > >> that is indeed another option - assuming it actually is a service and > >> doesnt go > >> direct to some sqlite db or file. :) > >> > >> > > Unfortunatly we cannot trust the application to make the control in > > Cynera, so the enforcement must be external to the application. > > When it come to critical or high usage App, they will always be > > provided by the platform creator who always has the option to created > > a trusted App which can by pass the default model. > > when i read "on the service side" i understood it was the server that > already exists handing out the resources so we do it at the current > protocol level of the service, not per api. (1 api might not equal 1 > protocol request).
That's indeed how it was meant. As Tomasz said, that was the original plan for integrating Cynara into Tizen. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
