On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 10:35 +0200, Aleksander Zdyb wrote: > On 25.08.2014 10:08, José Bollo wrote: > > but here again, it is a design choice. having only one flow is also > > good. if I'm correctly understanding your design, if write is > > blocking, the cached data are also blocked. best regards josé > > thanks for understanding. Indeed, Zofia and me wanted to make the flow > of client code simpler
Having error handling for cynara_async_check() only in one place would make that code simpler. Assuming that we don't need a return code from cynara_async_check() to indicate an immediate granted/denied result, do you agree that cynara_async_check() can return void and any errors will be passed to the callback? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
