On 6 October 2014 14:07, Jussi Laako <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6.10.2014 13:19, Stoppa, Igor wrote: >> >> I dare say that calling them "guests" in IVI is even misleading, >> because it might hint at permissions/restrictions that are typically >> associated with the "common" guest. > > > Yeah, could be called "anonymous" users?
Or "unauthenticated", but I'd prefer a name that really makes it explicit to which vertical the user is associated. Because both "anonymous" and "unauthenticated" might be used also by other profiles, but with different implementation. "ivi-anon" or equivalent (sorry, I'm not really good at making up names) follows the rule of least surprise. -- cheers, igor _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
