Patrick,
system Apps may have the same issue than Crosswalk, this is why my
proposition requires to check that the requesting App has the privilege
of AppID Proxy.
In detailed an App is identified by the couple (Smack label, user ID) so
the dialer may be a slightly different case because the surface shown
would be actually own by the dailer and not the application requesting
the call and so the Murpjy policy might be defined against the dialer
rather than the App requesting the call.
But you are correct in the fact that the general issue remains open.
Dominig ar Foll
Senior Software Architect
Open Source Technology Centre
Intel SSG
Le 07/10/2014 15:11, Patrick Ohly a écrit :
On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 14:33 +0200, Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC) wrote:
For native App the model is quite simple in the sense that the App
requesting the surface to Weston/Wayland is identifiable by it's AppID
(which equals its Smack label).
What about trusted system apps currently running with the same "user"
Smack label (for example, the Lemolo dialer)? Will that be possible
going forward, and how will they be treated by Murphy and/or the app
framework?
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
