Tomasz,
Thansk for your feedback .
When are you be able to provide an accurate schedule. On our side we are
dependant to your delivery, please consider that we need at least one
month for integration part.
Best regards, Cordialement
Bruno MECHIN
Tizen Vannes
Le 14/10/2014 11:01, Tomasz Swierczek a écrit :
Hi Mechin Bruno,
With Rafal (Security-Manager) and Lukasz Wojciechowski (working on
Cynara) we’ve just come up with task list, we’re working on schedule
and we’d like to share it, of course. Making Crosswalk run with
security integration to allow per-user/global app installation and
launch is our goal for Common release in December.
BRs,
cid:[email protected]
Tomasz Świerczek
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
Office +48 22 377 95 59
Cell +48 503 135 021
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*From:*Dev [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *MECHIN
Bruno
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 14, 2014 10:58 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [Dev] Path of installed applications
Hi All,
As we have an agreement, It will be very useful to provide schedule to
implementing, integrating and validating these feature.
So, José, Rafal, would you mind providing us such schedule ?
Best regards, Cordialement
*Bruno MECHIN
*Tizen project
Le 13/10/2014 18:50, Rafał Krypa a écrit :
On 2014-10-09 14:23, José Bollo wrote:
Hi all,
During recent F2F of the security team, we had long discussion about the
packages that have more than one application.
There are some more decisions to finalize this behaviour. One of this
decision is to define the directory layout of the installation. There
are several choices.
Suppose a package whose id is PKG that have two applications whose ids
inside the package are APP1 and APP2. The global ids of these two
applications are GAPP1 and GPP2, they are computed on the base of the
pairs (PKG, APP1) and (PKG, APP2), for example: PKG.APP1 or PKG:APP1.
When installing the package into the directory APPSDIR, what structure
will be chosen?
1) APPSDIR/PGK/APP1 and APPSDIR/PGK/APP2
or
2) APPSDIR/GAPP1 and APPSDIR/GAPP2
IIRC, the choice (2) was pointed out during F2F, but I'm not sure that
it was really discussed. Do you confirm? What would be best?
Hi,
The final proposal was based on the choice [1]. The separate directory
level for pkgId is necessary for file exchange between applications inside the
package.
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
