As Chanho explained, we will enable aarch64 builds soon in Tizen:Common. I propose to have an exception in our process and let the build error on crosswalk land in the main project, so that people can have a aarch64 repo and investigate the build error with gbs. Anyone against that idea ?
BR -- Stéphane Desneux Intel OTC - Vannes/FR gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726 On 15/10/2014 12:32, Chanho Park wrote: > Dear all, > > We're preparing promotion of aarch64 from staging OBS project[1]. The > official release will be after IVI-2014.m3 release. > There is only two failed packages. The one is oprofile. Actually, it can be > fixed easily we just upgrade it to 1.0 version. But, the owner of the package > decided to remove it[2]. The another is crosswalk. It was only failed on > aarch64. We can't handle it because we're not expert of the crosswalk. I hope > web guys can resolve the issue :) > > You can see our contributions and changes from wiki page[3]. Many things were > already merged into current source tree. > You can also build your package using gbs to follow wiki guide[4]. > > Best Regards, > Chanho Park > > [1]: > https://build.tizen.org/project/show?project=devel%3Aarm_toolchain%3AMobile%3ATizen_Common > [2]: https://lists.tizen.org/pipermail/dev/2014-October/004444.html > [3]: > https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/OSDev/AArch64_porting#Project_devel:arm_toolchain:Mobile:Tizen_Common > [4]: https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/OSDev/GBS/AArch64 > _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
