Hi all,

On dom, 2014-10-19 at 09:00 +0200, Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC) wrote:
> Le 17/10/2014 09:17, Zheng, Wu a écrit :
> > Hi Patrick,
> >
> >> I suspect you were assuming that all processes can only do Bluetooth via 
> >> your framework. If yes, then you need to
> >>      A. ensure that all Bluetooth users in Tizen do that,
> >>      B. and then (and only then!) ensure that all other ways of doing
> >>         Bluetooth are prohibited.
> > It should be A and B.
> >
> > And Doming has some suggestion and we will do it too.
> > " the easiest implementation is to run only one NTB daemon with privilege 
> > and to get the user to pass their request via the daemon."
> > " we run NTB as a special user (e.g. bluetooth), then we can limit any 
> > transport creation access via BlueZ control to that privilege user."
> >
> >
> Yes, it should be A and B.
> We have multiple option to activate these restriction from Smack to D 
> Bus policy.

Such restriction are already made in bluetooth.conf. It is working
without use of Smack or Cyanara. The policy is made on users and groups.

From reading that file, it appears that the group 'bt_use' is the group
to be in to get control. But I'm not expert of the topic...
 
> I would rather see the daemon running with as little privilege as possible.

Yes, IMHO, it should be a system user of name 'bluetooth' and of group
'bluetooth' (instead of 'bt_use').

The NTB daemon and the bluetooth daemon could be running as 'bluetooth',
allowing them to communicate through DBUS with a policy based on the
user.

Is bluetooth/bluez engine creating specific objects/interfaces for the
communication between end-user-client and service BT, once the device is
paired? 

If yes, the "address" of that object have to be open to end users in the
current design where end-user-client exchange directly with the service
via DBUS.

From a security point of view, it is a hole because how to avoid clients
to try guessing?

Best regards
José Bollo


_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to