Hi Martin, On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Xu, Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > Patrik >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Patrick Ohly [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 11:47 >> To: Xu, Martin >> Cc: Kis, Zoltan; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Dev] discuss on NTB > I'd like to use this mail to summarize our discussion, and end our debate. :) > > Firstly, from technical point, we do not have any disagreement with each > other. > > Secondly, so as to the understand of phrase 1 Multi-user requirement, we are > also learning it, as I said before, currently, the feedback from Dominique's > team is that it works fine. But I still need to get confirmation. The Phrase > 1 support is the requirement Tizen-3.0 common team. I need to do that to make > sure NTB can be integrate into Tizen-3.0 > > Third, I hope you know I do know the issues you mentioned to current > Bluetooth framework even Tizen. Myself and my team spent a lot of efforts and > trying our best to resolve them. We worked very closely with Samsung and > Comms upstream, we have our plan and strategy, but we need to step by step to > do that. Just like Dominique has summarized, we need to sync with upstream, > we need to sync with Samsung. It is not easy, but we are trying our best to > push things forward. NTB-0.2 has resolved some of the issues, and the > following release will continue to address the other issues. But before that > we must push NTB into Tizen-3.0, that is our first priority task. And you > know after long time work with Samsung comms team, they also agree to work > with us to merge NTB into Tizen-3.0. > > So as to TCT test, through that test I want to show People, we have finished > all the Tizen existing CAPI, that is all we are working on and the target for > the first step work plan. > > And so as to the feature missing on CAPI, you mentioned, that is the > different task. And that is the CAPI issue itself. But we are quite glad to > work with people on it, that is also our goal to deliver a perfect Tizen > Comms stack.
Perhaps the CAPI context in IVI needs to be discussed first, as far I know it is not compatible with GENIVI, in fact it is much more likely that an IVI platform will use Tizen as middleware only since manufactures like to have their own business logic on top. CAPI is only really useful when it comes to user applications which is where TCT tests apply, for middleware in my opinion it is probably more important to stay GENIVI compliant. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
