On 2014-11-26 14:09, Manuel Bachmann wrote: > Hi folks, > > This RFC is about bug TC-1691, TC-159... > / > / > /(The problem happens with Crosswalk today, but it could happen with any > other application) > / > AUL provide somes function calls, like "aul_app_get_pkgname_bypid ()", which > permit to get the application package name associated with a running PID. > > Under IVI, the ICO Homescreen (profile/ivi/ico-uxf-homescreen) uses these > calls to determine if it should show a window, by getting the PID of its > process, and then comparing it will the package name. If if does not match, > the window stays hidden.
Hi Manuel, Please clarify one thing:do you need to retrieve package name (a.k.a. pkgId) or application name (appId)? What if there are multiple applications in a package? Duringlast security workshop in Vannes in October, a requirement was formulated that AUL needs to identify application processes by fetching appId from a running process. I'd like to know if this requirement isstill valid. To implement it,I had to redesign Smack labeling for applications in security-manager to be based on appId instead of pkgId. This is still work inprogress and it complicates matters for security-manager. If for any reason this is not needed anymore, I would be happy to go back to the old labeling scheme. Best regards, Rafal Krypa
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
