On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Bartosh, Eduard
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> > My proposal so far was to start with what we have, look at how it works
>> and then enhance if needed. Does it make sense for you?

>> 2/ It would be nice to have a cron job that fetch and upload git tags from
>> upstream to avoid use to force/workaround theirs (from sandbox/) in their
>> .gbs.conf (but we can work that way for now)
> Can you elaborate a bit? I'm not sure I follow.

on version bumps I feel it's more convenient to base on git tag from
upstream repos

see page 32

https://duckduckgo.com/l/?kh=-1&uddg=http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.tizen.org%2Fmisc%2Fmedia%2Fconference2014%2Fslides%2Ftdc2014-tizen-upstream-coop.pdf


Maintainer updates to new version

No need for upstream/x.y.z edit “.gbs.conf
[general]
upstream_branch = upstream
upstream_tag = libevdev-${upstreamversion}


but developer wont be able to push it to git
so he can workaround it by faking the tag to its branch

ie:

[general]
upstream_branch = upstream
upstream_tag = sandbox/$USER/upstream

and when working with pristine tarballs is even worse since he cant
push upstream/x.y.z tags

but let keep this problem aside
we can assume developers wont bump versions first

may we push a RFC in dev list now ?


-- 
 mailto:[email protected]  --  gpg:0x467094BC
 xmpp:[email protected]
 https://dockr.eurogiciel.fr/blogs/embedded/author/pcl/
                                                                       .
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to