Good day Mr. Bollo,

  Right on build.tizen.org for x86_64:
  With security:
  [   69s] [185/186] installing boost-devel-1.57.0-8.2
  [   94s] [186/186] installing glib2-devel-2.43.1-7.3
  
https://build.tizen.org/package/rawlog?arch=x86_64&package=libzypp&project=Tizen:Common&repository=x86_64-wayland

  Without security:
  [   69s] [184/185] installing boost-devel-1.57.0-8.3
  [   71s] [185/185] installing glib2-devel-2.43.1-7.4
  
https://build.tizen.org/package/rawlog?arch=x86_64&package=libzypp&project=devel:arm_toolchain:Mobile:Tizen_Common&repository=x86_64-wayland

Best Regards,
Vyacheslav Barinov


José Bollo <[email protected]> writes:

> Le vendredi 06 février 2015 à 18:07 +0900, Chanho Park a écrit :
>> Dear all,
>> 
>> First of all, please understand I don't have much knowledge about security.
>> Do we need preinstalling the rpm-security-plugin on build? It causes
>> delaying of build time.
>> 
>> Preinstall: rpm-security-plugin
>> 
>> Please look below build log of dali-core.
>> 
>> [   54s] [126/126] installing boost-devel-1.57.0-8.2
>> [   85s] removing nis flags from //etc/nsswitch.conf...
>> 
>> To install a boost-devel package, it was taken 29 seconds. I know the
>> boost-devel package is an extreme case because it has thousands source
>> files.
>> Is there any way to except the rpm-security-plugin only build time?
>> 
>> With rpm-security-plugin:
>> bash-4.1# time rpm -ivh --force --nodeps boost-devel-1.51.0-2.41.i586.rpm 
>> 
>> real 0m25.276s
>> user 0m24.302s
>> sys  0m0.914s
>> 
>> Without rpm-security-plugin:
>> bash-4.1# rpm -e --force rpm-security-plugin
>> bash-4.1# time rpm -ivh --force --nodeps boost-devel-1.51.0-2.41.i586.rpm
>> real 0m1.754s
>> user 0m1.140s
>> sys  0m0.612s
>
>
> Hello Chanho,
>
> that is impressive, using rpm-security-plugin is 14x slower on a single
> rpm.
>
> Maybe that deactivating security during build is possible but it creates
> a kind of exception.
>
> Can we improve the time of rpm-security-plugin? This question can be
> asked too.
>
> What is your build system? Emulation? Emulated ARM on intel x32? It may
> also be an effect of emulation.
>
> Best regards
> José Bollo
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to