Xavier,

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Xavier Roche <
[email protected]> wrote:

>  Hi all,
>
> Sorry for the delay,
>
> Basically, I share the same point of view as Patrick...
> Using extraconf.inc files was a way to modify recipes without touching the
> auto-generated files ( *_git.bb, *.bb).
> Historically this auto-generation was useful for massive packages
> synchronisation...
> But now we get more and more closer to what the official tizen Common
> release provides.
>
> Vitaly, for your information, I am currently working on the last
> synchronisation with the in coming Tizen Common Q1 release.
> Since some major features have disappeared/changed/appeared from our last
> release, and since some important package bumping have to be applied, I
> would recommend you to push your current work in a sandbox.
> Doing so, you should then be able to easily rebase your sandbox on the
> release I am about to publish next week.
>
> We could then discuss to what extent / how your work could be integrated
> in meta-tizen...
>
> Does that seem acceptable to you?
>

Yes, it is acceptable for me, but in the past i have never used workflow
with sandboxing so i need some guidance. Could you provide an example of
push command?

With best regards,


> Regards,
>
> Xavier
>
> --
> Xavier Roche
> Intel Open Source Technology Center
>
>
> On 06/03/2015 09:51, Patrick Ohly wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 16:59 +0100, Baptiste Durand wrote:
>
>  Hi
>
>
> What he would like  to say is to put your changes into *-extraconf.inc
> files
> ie
> here :
>  crosswalk-thirdparty-extraconf.inc or crosswalk-extraconf.inc
>
>  This is how it was done traditionally. But as I explained when
> announcing the tizen-distro snapshot for IVI, that approach has several
> drawbacks: often, when only having to change one line, one has to copy a
> whole chunk of code from .inc into -extraconf.inc and then modify it
> there. The result is that git is unable to show that diff, and when
> updating the auto-generated .inc later one there is the risk that more
> recent code is not used because of the copied, stale code in
> -extraconf.inc.
>
> I used a different approach when putting together the IVI snapshot where
> modifying the auto-generated .inc file is okay and encouraged.
>
> It comes down to what the current maintainer, Xavier, intends to do.
> Xavier?
>
>
>
>


-- 
*Vitaly Chernooky | Senior Developer - Product Engineering and Development*
GlobalLogic
P *+380.44.4929695 ext.1136* M *+380.63.6011802* S cvv_2k
www.globallogic.com

http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to