Hello Joao,

IIRC we had that kind of error after a reboot. It seemed to come from an
error in deviced but I'm not 100% sure.

It should not raise that error with the official Common 2015 Q2.

BR
José (from vcation... what explains the delay)

2015-07-06 21:40 GMT+02:00 Joao Marinho Assis <[email protected]>:

> Hi José,
>
> I tried with 2 different builds to start the minimal image, but they
> always give me this error:
>
> [    0.454224] sd 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
> [    0.454319] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 1824688 512-byte logical blocks: (934
> MB/890 MiB)
> [    0.454363] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
> [    0.454379] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache:
> enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
> [    0.458727] scsi 1:0:0:0: CD-ROM            QEMU     QEMU DVD-ROM
>  2.0. PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
> [    0.461225] scsi 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg1 type 5
> [    0.463854]  sda: unknown partition table
> [    0.465275] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
> [    0.466329] VFS: Cannot open root device "sda1" or unknown-block(8,1):
> error -6
> [    0.467695] Please append a correct "root=" boot option; here are the
> available partitions:
> [    0.473829] 0800          912344 sda  driver: sd
> [    0.474940] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
> unknown-block(8,1)
> [    0.475691] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
> 3.14.28+ltsi-25.5-common-x86_64-default #1
> [    0.475691] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS
> Bochs 01/01/2011
> [    0.475691]  0000000000000000 ffff88003e057df8 ffffffff8154a64b
> ffffffff8183f052
> [    0.475691]  ffff88003e057e78 ffffffff81549793 3830002000000010
> ffff88003e057e88
> [    0.475691]  ffff88003e057e20 ffffffff815499af ffff88003e057e90
> 0000000000000006
> [    0.475691] Call Trace:
> [    0.475691]  [<ffffffff8154a64b>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x6f
> [    0.475691]  [<ffffffff81549793>] panic+0xbe/0x1bf
> [    0.475691]  [<ffffffff815499af>] ? printk+0x4a/0x52
> [    0.475691]  [<ffffffff81ae0268>] mount_block_root+0x296/0x2a5
> [    0.475691]  [<ffffffff81ae02ca>] mount_root+0x53/0x56
> [    0.475691]  [<ffffffff81ae0404>] prepare_namespace+0x137/0x16f
> [    0.475691]  [<ffffffff81adfef8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x1f5/0x205
> [    0.475691]  [<ffffffff81546c49>] ? rest_init+0x7d/0x7d
> [    0.475691]  [<ffffffff81546c52>] kernel_init+0x9/0xd5
> [    0.475691]  [<ffffffff8154fe3c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> [    0.475691]  [<ffffffff81546c49>] ? rest_init+0x7d/0x7d
> [    0.475691] Kernel Offset: 0x0 from 0xffffffff81000000 (relocation
> range: 0xffffffff80000000-0xffffffff9fffffff)
>
> Do you know what that might be?
>
> I tried tizen-common_20150507.1 and tizen-common_20150630.1, both have the
> same issue.
>
> Thanks very much,
> Joao Assis
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of José Bollo
> Sent: quinta-feira, 7 de maio de 2015 06:02
> To: 'Tizen Dev'
> Subject: [Dev] running tizen common minimal x86_64 using qemu
>
> Hi all,
>
> For your information, there is now an image minimal that can be run using
> qemu.
>
> See the below link for more details
>
> https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/Emulator#Tizen:Common_minimal_on_qemu
>
> Best regards
> José Bollo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to