Hi Larry,

Damon Cortesi here - as mentioned on Slack, happy to help in whatever
capacity I can.

Looks like CI is fixed, so can check other PRs or work on CVE items or any
devops-related stuff.

Thanks!

Damon

On 2022/10/31 14:45:32 larry mccay wrote:
> All -
>
> I think we should discuss first steps to reviving this project in the
> context of a release.
> There are numerous forks with features that we are looking to get into the
> revived project but I would suggest that we target an initial release of
> what is already there to ensure that we have the process down and can
> address any security issues and document the changes in 0.8.0.
>
> There are a couple things that I think we could address in this first
step:
>
> 1. I can't seem to find any Process docs on the site for doing an actual
> release. This needs to be documented, if not for doing the release then as
> an artifact of doing this next release. While we are at it, I believe that
> the site is also missing instructions for getting started as a developer
on
> the project. Adding such docs may help get new contributors engaged. I had
> to make a minor change (after hours of googling py-test build problems) to
> the python-api/setup.py script in order for it to build. Likely just a me
> problem.
> 2. CVE and dependency hygiene related tasks to make sure there is a clean
> version available to start from. This may require some github or other
> magic for determining problem dependencies that should be put in place
> and/or documented.
> 3. Delta between 0.7.0 and 0.8.0 release in terms of provided features,
> bugs and improvements.
>
> In parallel we can discuss the various changes and how to roll them into
> future releases rather than trying to boil the ocean all at once. A
> separate DISCUSS thread can be started to do an inventory of proposed
> features and improvements that will require one-pager wikis (LIPs) to
> describe the problem statement, usecases, approach. We will undoubtedly
> need to reconcile multiple implementations of some things by either
> convergence or optional pluggable implementations.
>
> Does anyone have enough context for the release process in order to be
> Release Manager for 0.8.0?
>
> Any other thoughts?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --larry
>

Reply via email to