Dear Marco,
Thank you very much for the quick response! I've opened a PR, I'd really
appreciate it if you could take a look:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-livy/pull/524
Best regards,
Gabor
> On 2026. May 28., at 10:24, Marco Gaido <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear Gabor,
>
> I fully agree. I'd say go on opening a PR, you can ping me for review if
> you want.
>
> Thanks,
> Marco
>
> Il giorno gio 28 mag 2026 alle ore 10:12 Gabor Roczei <[email protected]> ha
> scritto:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I would like to propose an update to our Pull Request template to align
>> with the official ASF Generative Tooling Guidance (
>> https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html).
>>
>> The ASF recommends tracking AI tool usage in patches (via "Generated-by:
>> [Tool]") to keep a clear record of its origin.
>>
>> I think we should update our PR template (
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-livy/blob/master/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE)
>> to include a section like Apache Spark's. Here is their template for
>> reference:
>> https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE
>>
>> ### Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
>> <!--
>> If generative AI tooling has been used in the process of authoring this
>> patch, please include the
>> phrase: 'Generated-by: ' followed by the name of the tool and its version.
>> If no, write 'No'.
>> Please refer to the [ASF Generative Tooling Guidance](
>> https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) for details.
>> -->
>>
>> What do you think about updating our template with this? If there are no
>> objections, I can open a PR to update the template file.
>>
>> I have already applied this approach in one of my current PRs:
>>
>> LIVY-1042: Add SSL/TLS support for ZooKeeper connection:
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-livy/pull/523
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Gabor
