The issue with that though is by using the template we plan to not use the
current site code, so importing it to only completely delete and replace it
doesn't make sense to me. Though if it's not against the Apache guidelines
we could always leave the gh-pages branch in the main repo for prior credit
and start from the template in the website repo. I'm not sure what the
apache guidelines are for branches, we do have a few junk branches in the
repo currently.

                                                                                
   
 Alex Bozarth                                                                   
   
 Software Engineer                                                              
   
 Spark Technology Center                                                        
   
                                                                                
   
                                                                                
     
                                                                                
     
                                                                                
     
 E-mail: [email protected]                                                    
     
 GitHub: github.com/ajbozarth                                                   
     
                                                                   505 Howard 
Street 
                                                             San Francisco, CA 
94105 
                                                                       United 
States 
                                                                                
     








From:   Saisai Shao <[email protected]>
To:     [email protected]
Date:   07/13/2017 02:20 PM
Subject:        Re: Another approach for Livy Website



Maybe we can apply the original changes to the master branch and then do
the changes based on it to just keep the history.

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Alex Bozarth <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't have a problem with it but given commits to branches aren't given
> credit in the master branch I'd say if we went with the template we
should
> just start from scratch and forget the history.
>
> On the note of starting from scratch, I support the idea and am willing
to
> personally take on the task of filling out the template with our current
> content. I've already written down a list of current content from the
> website, wiki, and README that makes sense to put in the webpage and was
> planning on putting in a JIRA once the JIRA migrated but I can share it
> here if desired.
>
>
> *Alex Bozarth*
> Software Engineer
> Spark Technology Center
> ------------------------------
> *E-mail:* *[email protected]* <[email protected]>
> *GitHub: **github.com/ajbozarth* <https://github.com/ajbozarth>
>
>
> 505 Howard Street
> San Francisco, CA 94105
> United States
>
>
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for Saisai Shao ---07/13/2017 01:57:11
> PM---It's fine for me. Not sure if other guys have additional conc]Saisai
> Shao ---07/13/2017 01:57:11 PM---It's fine for me. Not sure if other guys
> have additional concern. On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:52 PM, L
>
> From: Saisai Shao <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Date: 07/13/2017 01:57 PM
> Subject: Re: Another approach for Livy Website
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> It's fine for me. Not sure if other guys have additional concern.
>
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:52 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I think we could fork the template repository, and try to push the
> current
> > Livy website as a branch (e.g. original_website) ? That should resolve
> the
> > current concerns about history/credits.
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Saisai Shao <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think this is great. Looking from the previous thread our major
> concern
> > > is to keep the contribution history/credits, will this break the
> > > history/credits? If not I think this probably be better.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Luciano Resende
<[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > While looking at the current website, it seems that there are only
> > three
> > > > pages based on pure HTML content.
> > > >
> > > > Should we look into actually creating a new website from scratch,
> based
> > > on
> > > > Jekkyl, similar to what a few of the other projects are using (e.g.
> > > Spark,
> > > > Bahir, SystemML, etc).
> > > >
> > > > If we choose this approach, there is already a template available (
> > > > https://github.com/apache/apache-website-template) that follows
most
> > of
> > > > the
> > > > Apache Policy and has most of the structure for pages like
download,
> > > > community, etc. and we will only need to change model and update
> > content
> > > > but in the long run will make it easier for the community to
> contribute
> > > and
> > > > extend the website much simpler.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts ?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Luciano Resende
> > > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to