Makes sense to me! On 15 May 2017 at 11:52, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
> I’d prefer log4j-plugins over log4j-tools. > > Ralph > > > On May 15, 2017, at 9:38 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yeah, it seems like the easiest thing to do would be to add it to > > log4j-tools or something. I just imported my git repo from work and > > published the source so I have somewhere to start. > > > > On 15 May 2017 at 11:37, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Why are you doing this as your own project? This could easily be hosted > >> here. > >> > >> Ralph > >> > >>> On May 15, 2017, at 9:30 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> I wrote a pretty trivial Slack webhook appender at work and was given > the > >>> go ahead to publish it as open source. It's not as fully fleshed out as > >> the > >>> HttpAppender idea, but nevertheless, it may be useful for someone: > >>> > >>> https://github.com/jvz/log4j-slack > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
