On 2017-05-19, Dominik Psenner wrote: > would we like to use gitflow for our named branches? [1]
I've used gitflow in one or two projects at work and we've never really come to a situation where having the release branch really helped. Maybe because we didn't create bug fix releases on a regular basis and creating a branch off the tag when you needed one was not a big burden. I do like feature branches for changes you work a bit longer on or bug fixes you feel may require a hotfix. I've never really grasped what the tag-only master is good for, tags are kept alive in git anyway, you don't need a branch for them. That being said, I'm not against using gitflow I'm just not convinced of the benefits it claims to offer. Stefan
