On 24 May 2017 6:09 p.m., "Stefan Bodewig" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2017-05-24, Dominik Psenner wrote: > Sorry, that mail was semantically wrong. It was obviously too late in the > evening when i wrote it. :-) I originally meant this: ref? I think you mean rel. Maybe it hasn't been too late after all? ;-) *facepalm and laughing* .. rel/ .. For consistency I'll move the last remaining release tag also to rel/ but without signing it. > Do we want to remove all non ref/ tags that have a ref/ tag? And further, > do we want to move the rc tags to rc/x.y.z.f-RCx? Re: non-rel Tags, what I said below. I don't care much. rc/* is a nice idea for future tags. Then I'll move the x.y.z-RC tags to rc/x.y.z-RC and sign them later today. Further I'll hack on the release instructions. Stefan > On 24 May 2017 3:19 p.m., "Stefan Bodewig" <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2017-05-23, Dominik Psenner wrote: >>> I just noticed that we have several rel/tags in our repository. Thanks >>> Stefan for crafting those pgp signed immutable tags. >> rel/* is protected in our git repos, so we are encouraged to use them >> for release tags. >>> Do we want to avoid duplication and remove the tags that have no rel/ >>> prefix? >> I don't care much. The tags before 1.2.11 have been created by somebody >> else than me so removing them feels a bit like re-writing history, but >> only a bit. >> Stefan
