Thanks - I didn’t notice I had left that lying around. I have deleted it.
Ralph > On Jun 18, 2017, at 5:12 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am confused by the layout: there is a log4j-api-java9 folder inside > the log4j-api-java9 folder? > > Gary > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 4:35 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ralph, thank you!! >> I just tried it and it works great. All I needed to do was tell IntelliJ >> IDEA to use Java 9 for the log4j-api-java9 module and it all just works in >> the IDE again. >> Great, thanks again! >> >> Remko >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 4:39 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I have modified the Java 9 support yet again. I was having a problem with >>> a Maven plugin I am building where the Maven annotation processor was >>> failing because it was finding a Java 9 class that it couldn’t read. To >> fix >>> this I have separated the Java 9 support to its own module and then am >>> overlaying that into the log4j-api jar as a multi-release jar. One >> benefit >>> of this is that the Java 9 code can now be tested in the build as that >> one >>> module uses Java 9 for compilation and testing. >>> >>> While doing this I was having a terrible time getting the multi-release >>> jar to work and in the process I was able to narrow down the stack >> locator >>> code to just a single class. However, when I run mvn surefire:test >>> -Dtest=StackLocatorTest in java9 it is not selecting the Java 9 version >> of >>> the class. But I created a main program and ran that and it did select >> the >>> correct class, so I am not sure what the problem is and I have already >>> spent two days trying to debug it. >>> >>> I also added the deploy plugin with skip set to true for the java9 module >>> so it wouldn’t go to Nexus. While I was at it I added the same thing for >>> the other modules that aren’t supposed to go to Maven central. >>> >>> In addition to making my plugin work this should also make it easier to >>> edit the Java 9 classes in your IDE. I know it helped me in IntelliJ. >>> >>> Please let me know if you find any issues. >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>
