[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16058530#comment-16058530
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LOG4J2-1699:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit 5b2df230d9809962687fd792d70c1f4a46961719 in logging-log4j2's branch
refs/heads/master from [~phymbert]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=logging-log4j2.git;h=5b2df23 ]
[LOG4J2-1699] Configurable Log File Permissions with
PosixFilePermission. Apply patch with some formatting tweaks to
RollingAppenderSizeCompressPermissionsTest.
> Configurable Log File Permissions with PosixFilePermission
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-1699
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1699
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Question
> Components: Appenders
> Environment: Linux
> Reporter: Demetrios Dimatos
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: features
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: LOG4J2-1699-2.patch, LOG4J2-1699.patch
>
> Original Estimate: 336h
> Remaining Estimate: 336h
>
> We would like to hear the communities thoughts on being able to configure the
> permissions log files are created with. We don't want to rely on UMASK
> because we have managed services who's process should generate logs with a
> 644 yet deployed applications by users should default to a 640 because the
> logs may contain sensitive information.
> We will make the modification and set this in the properties file. Now we are
> looking to see what the community position would be on accepting such a
> patch, we don't want to be patching our own distribution indefinitely.
> I searched all the JIRAs and was not able to find any matching requirements
> recently. All I could find was something dated in 2006:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40407
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
