I did not realize the sites were archived. That's great. We only need to document that fact and link.
Gary On Jun 25, 2017 21:57, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: The Legacy section on the left nav bar contains a link for Log4j 1.x and Log4j 2.3. These two releases (and sites) have special significance. No other releases do. They should not be lost in a sea of other releases. Plus, it would make that left navigation extremely long. Although all the previous release sites are available online, the 2.x sites are also available at https://archive.apache.org/dist/logging/log4j/ < https://archive.apache.org/dist/logging/log4j/> as zip files. I have no problem having the links to the web site available somewhere else, but I would imagine it would have to be maintained by hand. Ralph > On Jun 25, 2017, at 8:05 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > You're talking about something different, the change reports are one thing, > the site is another. > > I am thinking of users that are stuck on an old random release either by > direct or transitive dependency. Using the site that matches their version > would be quite helpful. No urgent of course. > > Gary > > > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > >> I only created that so people would be able to find release 2.3 if they >> needed to use Java 6. My fear is that if we add all the releases there then >> that will get lost in the noise. BTW - all the releases are listed at >> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/changes-report.html < >> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/changes-report.html>. If we were >> going to list all the releases then I would suggest a history page that has >> some sort of description about each release. >> >> Ralph >> >>> On Jun 25, 2017, at 6:16 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> We have a nice "Legacy" section of our site. I think we should track >> every >>> release there. >>> >>> 2c, >>> Gary >> >>
