On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Seems simpler to fix the Gradle plugin(s) for Android honestly.
>

How can changing plugins (I'm not using the work "fix" here) any easier? It
sure would take a lot longer... and it's something we have no control
over...

Gary

>
> On 8 July 2017 at 21:26, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I say we keep it simple: Deliver log4j-api-java9 as an add-on to
> log4j-api
> > instead of being clever with log4j-api embedding Java 9 classes a la
> > Titanic.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I do not think that is how Android development works. The .class files
> > are
> > > converted to .dex files from what I can tell, a different byte code
> > format
> > > used by both Dalvik (discontinued) and ART.
> > >
> > > Gary
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Is it trying to process the class files generated by java? I thought
> > >> Android compiled Java source.  If it is looking at class files then it
> > >> needs to ignore everything under META-INF
> > >>
> > >> Sent from my iPad
> > >>
> > >> > On Jul 8, 2017, at 5:58 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > We are worst off with our 2.9-SNAPSHOT, I can't even build an app
> > using
> > >> > only log4j-api:
> > >> >
> > >> > AGPBI: {"kind":"error","text":"Error converting bytecode to
> > dex:\nCause:
> > >> > Dex cannot parse version 53 byte code.\nThis is caused by library
> > >> > dependencies that have been compiled using Java 8 or above.\nIf you
> > are
> > >> > using the \u0027java\u0027 gradle plugin in a library submodule add
> > >> > \ntargetCompatibility \u003d \u00271.7\u0027\nsourceCompatibility
> > >> \u003d
> > >> > \u00271.7\u0027\nto that submodule\u0027s build.gradle
> > >> > file.","sources":[{}],"original":"UNEXPECTED TOP-LEVEL
> > >> > EXCEPTION:\njava.lang.RuntimeException: Exception parsing
> > classes\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.command.dexer.Main.processClass(Main.java:781)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.command.dexer.Main.processFileBytes(Main.
> > java:747)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.command.dexer.Main.access$1200(Main.java:88)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.command.dexer.Main$FileBytesConsumer.processF
> > >> ileBytes(Main.java:1689)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.cf.direct.ClassPathOpener.processArchive(Clas
> > >> sPathOpener.java:284)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.cf.direct.ClassPathOpener.processOne(ClassPat
> > >> hOpener.java:166)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.cf.direct.ClassPathOpener.process(ClassPathOp
> > >> ener.java:144)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.command.dexer.Main.processOne(Main.java:695)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.command.dexer.Main.processAllFiles(Main.
> > java:592)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.command.dexer.Main.runMultiDex(Main.java:376)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.command.dexer.Main.run(Main.java:290)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.builder.internal.compiler.DexWrapper.run(DexWrap
> > >> per.java:54)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.builder.core.DexByteCodeConverter.lambda$dexInPr
> > >> ocess$0(DexByteCodeConverter.java:174)\n\tat
> > >> > java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)\n\tat
> > >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPool
> > >> Executor.java:1142)\n\tat
> > >> > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoo
> > >> lExecutor.java:617)\n\tat
> > >> > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)\nCaused by:
> > >> > com.android.dx.cf.iface.ParseException: bad class file magic
> > >> (cafebabe) or
> > >> > version (0035.0000)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.cf.direct.DirectClassFile.parse0(DirectClassF
> > >> ile.java:476)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.cf.direct.DirectClassFile.parse(DirectClassFi
> > >> le.java:406)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.cf.direct.DirectClassFile.parseToInterfacesIf
> > >> Necessary(DirectClassFile.java:388)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.cf.direct.DirectClassFile.getMagic(DirectClas
> > >> sFile.java:251)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.command.dexer.Main.parseClass(Main.java:793)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.command.dexer.Main.access$1600(Main.java:88)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.command.dexer.Main$ClassParserTask.call(Main.
> > >> java:1728)\n\tat
> > >> > com.android.dx.command.dexer.Main.processClass(Main.java:
> 779)\n\t...
> > 16
> > >> > more\n","tool":"Dex"}
> > >> > AGPBI: {"kind":"error","text":"1 error; aborting","sources":[{}]}
> > >> >
> > >> > Can we split off this Java 9 stuff in a separate module?
> > >> >
> > >> > Gary
> > >> >
> > >> >> On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> If you've got some instructions on how to even get an Android
> project
> > >> up
> > >> >> and running, getting some test code to play with would certainly
> > help.
> > >> Long
> > >> >> ago when I tried debugging some Android issues with Log4j, I
> couldn't
> > >> even
> > >> >> get that far. :/
> > >> >>
> > >> >>> On 8 July 2017 at 17:31, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> A quick follow up to note that with 2.8.2, using log4j-api does
> not
> > >> cause
> > >> >>> problems but then adding log4j-core causes the app to fail to
> start.
> > >> So I
> > >> >>> definitively see an Android epic for 2.10. Maybe this is when we
> > want
> > >> to
> > >> >>> split up log4j-core.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> Gary
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Gary Gregory <
> > garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>> wrote:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>> So here I am with my family our of town on a weekend, and I
> thought
> > >> I'd
> > >> >>>> give Log4j on Android a try.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> The first thing I run into is:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> * What went wrong:
> > >> >>>> Execution failed for task ':Application:transformResourc
> > >> esWithMergeJav
> > >> >>>> aResForDebug'.
> > >> >>>>> com.android.build.api.transform.TransformException:
> > >> >>>> com.android.builder.packaging.DuplicateFileException: Duplicate
> > >> files
> > >> >>>> copied in APK META-INF/LICENSE
> > >> >>>> File1: C:\Users\ggregory\.gradle\caches\modules-2\files-2.1\
> > >> >>>> org.apache.logging.log4j\log4j-core\2.8.2\
> > >> >> 979fc0cf8460302e4ffbfe38c1b66a
> > >> >>>> 99450b0bb7\log4j-core-2.8.2.jar
> > >> >>>> File2: C:\Users\ggregory\.gradle\caches\modules-2\files-2.1\
> > >> >>>> org.apache.logging.log4j\log4j-api\2.8.2\
> > >> >> e590eeb783348ce8ddef205b82127f
> > >> >>>> 9084d82bf3\log4j-api-2.8.2.jar
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> * Try:
> > >> >>>> Run with --stacktrace option to get the stack trace. Run with
> > --info
> > >> or
> > >> >>>> --debug option to get more log output.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> BUILD FAILED
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Total time: 1.995 secs
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> which is solved by:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/37586800/android-
> > >> >>>> gradle-duplicate-files-copied-in-apk-meta-inf-license-txt
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Which means I have to add this to my build:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> packagingOptions {
> > >> >>>>    exclude 'META-INF/DEPENDENCIES'
> > >> >>>>    exclude 'META-INF/LICENSE'
> > >> >>>> }
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> I wonder if we should generate these files pretending we are in
> an
> > >> uber
> > >> >>> jar, either:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> - with the project name in the name like META-INF/log4j2.LICENSE
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> - with maven AID in the name like META-INF/log4j-api.LICENSE
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> - with maven coords in the name like META-INF/org.apache.logging.
> > >> >>> log4j-log4j-api.LICENSE
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> As an aside files like LICENSE and NOTICE do not have .txt
> > extensions
> > >> >>> which is lame IMO.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Ignore and do nothing? Thoughts?
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Gary
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --
> > >> >> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>

Reply via email to