On 9 July 2017 at 18:32, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> > On Jul 9, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Suppose we have an Android-specific api jar. Then when an Android
> developer
> > gets log4j-api transitively, what now? I don't see normal libraries using
> > log4j-api-android or something instead of the standard one.
>
> This would be an android specific build, so they can exclude log4j-api and
> include log4j-api-android instead. That isn’t much different than what
> people have to do to use SLF4J’s commons-logging bridge.
>
> Ralph
>

That makes sense to me. Would it be appropriate to give this a classifier
or just name it log4j-api-android? I'd imagine a classifier version might
work if that is generated straight from log4j-api without the jdk9 classes
added.

-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to