If this <http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.0/log4j-users-guide.pdf> is it then, its just silly things like the bullet formatting consistency on page 2 (not roman numeral, the actual page 2). I just figured if I was reading through it I might as well clean up what I find as I go like the commenting stuff lately.
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > The link to the pdf is on the main log4j 2 web page. The pdf is generated > from the same source used to generate the html pages and we rarely review > the pdf to see that things have extended beyond the page borders, so it > wouldn’t be surprising to see those kinds of errors. The only changes in > the pdf will be the same changes that have gone into the web site. I don’t > believe we publish a snapshot of the site anywhere so you would have to run > it locally. Instructions for doing that are on the wiki. > > Ralph > > > On Jul 23, 2017, at 5:08 PM, kenneth mcfarland < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > The reason I ask is because there are multiple versions showing up on > > Google and the version I downloaded and have been reading is for 2.8 (I > > believe) with some prominent formatting errors. > > > > As I have been getting up to speed I have been contributing simple fixes > > for documentation and the like, and I've found some errors in the PDF > guide > > but what is the point fixing an out of date guide ya know? > > > > Thank you Gary :) > > > > > > On Jul 23, 2017 4:53 PM, "Gary Gregory" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Good question, I do not see it on the site. You might have to build it > from > >> sources but I do not see instructions in our BUILDING.md file on how to > use > >> maven-pdf-plugin. > >> > >> Gary > >> > >> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 4:04 PM, kenneth mcfarland < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Can somebody point me at the newest version of the log4j2 user guide > PDF > >>> file? > >>> > >> > > >
