For Chainsaw, we'd only need the one version. When we eventually get Log4j2 into a pipeline, we'll need both Java 7 and 9, maybe even Java 8 for testing purposes (plus Java 8 would be required for the Log4jScala build).
On 3 August 2017 at 02:16, Dominik Psenner <[email protected]> wrote: > The log4net jenkinsfile pipeline is complicated because it targets many > different frameworks, each one requiring different conditional compiletime > constants. This java application should be by far easier to build by > targeting the smallest java version to be supported. > > I would certainly not expect a java ui on maven central. > > On 2 Aug 2017 4:29 p.m., "Matt Sicker" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Also, as mentioned elsewhere, we should get a Jenkinsfile configured for > > this project. It would be a good place to experiment with using the > > pipelines feature with a Java project as the only other Logging example > we > > have so far is for .NET which is a lot more complicated it looks like. > > > > On 2 August 2017 at 09:27, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Getting snapshots configured to upload to the Apache repo would be a > good > > > first step so that users can download them from the proper location, > > though > > > I'm not sure if that's appropriate for GUI applications (there are some > > > full featured Java applications on Maven Central technically, though > > > they're all headless that I know of). Beyond that, I agree that a > release > > > would be necessary both to get artifacts on dist.a.o along with an > > updated > > > site with docs. > > > > > > On 2 August 2017 at 08:24, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> Work has been done to try to modify the Chainsaw site to meet the ASF > > >> branding requirements, although the site does not yet reflect that. > > >> However, the download link is clearly problematic as it has the > release > > >> artifacts inside the web site, which is not compliant with ASF release > > >> guidelines. > > >> > > >> Performing a release would be one way to fix this. > > >> > > >> Other thoughts? > > >> > > >> Ralph > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
