But is it more generic than JavaEE? If not, a generic name is misleading.
On 2017-09-07 00:07, Remko Popma wrote:
log4j-container?
(To be more generic than javaee)
On Sep 7, 2017, at 4:56, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
Yes, the intent would be to allow containers to use Log4j as their logging
implementation.
Ralph
On Sep 6, 2017, at 12:26 PM, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote:
Is the point to integrate with JavaEE containers, not necessarily from a web
app?
Then I would suggest a new module log4j-javaee, and to put it in the main repo.
On 2017-09-06 20:49, Ralph Goers wrote:
On the commons list I got some pointers on how to integrate with Tomcat 8.5+
and TomEE. I’ve written the class that is required but am wondering where to
put it. It could go in log4j-core, but that isn’t where we have been putting
these things. It really shouldn’t go in log4j-web as users may not want that
jar just to get the integration with log4j.
I am thinking a new module should be created for this - something like
log4j-containers. If I do that does it belong in log4j2 or in log4j-tools,
log4j-boot or some other repo?
