[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16173212#comment-16173212
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on LOG4J2-2031:
---------------------------------------------------------

Commit cf163a995a1ceea805ff162dc20debf933094ea8 in logging-log4j2's branch 
refs/heads/master from rpopma
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=logging-log4j2.git;h=cf163a9 ]

LOG4J2-2031 Update change log

Until this change, messages appeared out of order in log file any time when the 
async logging queue was full. With this change, messages are only logged out of 
order to prevent deadlock when Log4j2 detects recursive logging while the queue 
is full.


> Messages appear out of order in log file (was: Log4j2 log file not reflecting 
> application log function calls)
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-2031
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2031
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Appenders
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.2, 2.9.0
>         Environment: Windows, Sun Java 8.
>            Reporter: Colin McDowell
>            Assignee: Remko Popma
>         Attachments: CapacityTest.java, log4j2.xml, pom2.xml
>
>   Original Estimate: 672h
>  Remaining Estimate: 672h
>
> Was hoping to move our numerous J2EE projects from Log4j to Log4j2 for the 
> performance improvements.  I put together a small test case that writes a 
> string pattern to a Rolling File.  There is a 6 digit sequence number at the 
> start of the log message.  This allows me to quickly see if all the log 
> requests are making it into the log file. I attach the test case and 
> log4j2.xml.  The log4j2.xml uses an asynchronous appender.
> What I observe in the output log file is that after a short interval (120 or 
> so entries) the logged are appearing in the wrong order, and entries can be 
> missing.  The missing entries issues especially shows up when rolling to the 
> next log file.
> Perhaps there is a deliberate decision to not to guarantee log file 
> accurately for speed.  However we need the logs to accurately reflect what 
> the application is logging.  I have also noticed the performance is 25% worse 
> in Log4j2 than Log4j when not using the asynchronous appender.  So that 
> rather kills us using Log4j2 at the moment.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to