Also, I plan on adding the manifest headers so Log4j classifies as somewhat modularized before the next release.
Ralph > On Sep 21, 2017, at 1:08 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Sep 21, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>>> On Sep 21, 2017, at 7:35 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Oracle has asked me if we have an official announcement that we are "JDK >>> 9 >>>> ready". Do we? >>>> >>>> We are listed here: >>>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/quality/Quality+Outreach < >>> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/quality/Quality+Outreach> >>> >>> I have been hesitant to do that simply because we are not modularized. >>> There is one user I have seen who is trying to build an application that >>> only uses modularized components. I don’t think he is going to be >>> successful at this point. >>> >>> On the other hand, if JDK 9 ready means that we support running in Java 9 >>> applications then the answer would be yes, so it depends on what the >>> definition of “JDK 9 Ready” is. I did send an mail to Rory a couple of >>> weeks ago saying Log4j was ready to run in Java 9. >>> >> >> Just to close the loop, it is Rory I am emailing with as well. >> >> Gary > > OK, then you might want to clarify what JDK 9 Ready really means. > > Ralph
