We haven't really discussed the use of gitbox in this project yet, so that's not an issue right now. What we do have is a sync between PR comments to the mentioned JIRA ticket, and that generates duplicate emails as it is.
On 13 October 2017 at 01:56, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > I don’t know if logging is a gitbox project but keep in mind that also a > lot of the github discussions will disappear if you do this. > > On 13/10/2017, 00:56, "Remko Popma" <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think that's a good idea. (I really wish we could have fewer > duplicate emails though.) > > Remko > > > > > Senior Software Developer > daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > > > > > On Oct 13, 2017, at 6:59, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Stuff that requires human intervention should stay prominent. The > rest can > > go away. :-) > > > > 2017-10-12 23:06 GMT+02:00 Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>: > > > >> It will also make the quarterly board reports more accurate. > >> reporter.apache.org provides the number of emails received on the > list > >> during the quarter. In my view, having the GitHub, Jira, Jenkins, > etc > >> emails on the dev list skews things as they dominate they number of > “real” > >> discussion emails that happen on the list, which is what I think is > the > >> important part of what the board wants to know. > >> > >> Ralph > >> > >>> On Oct 12, 2017, at 1:58 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> If it makes email filter rules easier to configure, I'd say go for > it. > >> It'd > >>> be just like the commits@ list though with floods of emails > coming in > >> every > >>> so often that I just have to skip over (e.g., rebasing a long lived > >> branch). > >>> > >>> On 12 October 2017 at 15:45, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> I do not care either way. > >>>> > >>>> Gary > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:34 PM, Ralph Goers < > >> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> What do others think about the idea of creating a separate > mailing list > >>>>> for emails generated by tools? This list gets a bit noisy from > all the > >>>>> extra emails and I have a hard time filtering this list because > of how > >>>> some > >>>>> of the emails are generated. > >>>>> > >>>>> I would also say that we expect every committer to be subscribed > to > >> that > >>>>> list. > >>>>> > >>>>> Ralph > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Dominik Psenner > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
