On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> I should add that each module must have a unique package hierarchy so, in > general, the package names should be org.apache.logging.log4j.modulename. > In this case it would be org.apache.logging.log4j.jeromq.apppender. The > mom package probably has no value. > I'll change the packages and write the changes in the release notes. Gary > > Ralph > > > On Jan 28, 2018, at 2:23 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > wrote: > > > > Any component that is not in the core module MUST NOT use the core > package. That would make it impossible to package them as Java 9 modules. > > > > Ralph > > > >> On Jan 28, 2018, at 11:31 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Now that the ZeroMQ via JeroMQ support is in its own module > log4j-jeromq, I > >> wonder if the Java package should change from > >> > >> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.appender.mom.jeromq > >> > >> to > >> > >> org.apache.logging.log4j.appender.mom.jeromq > >> > >> ? > >> > >> Same for the recently moved JPA appender. > >> > >> Same for impending move of the Kafka appender. > >> > >> This would break BC for Core for apps that directly reference these > >> classes. As opposed to referencing the appenders from an XML/JSON/YAML > >> config file. > >> > >> Gary > > > > >
