I was thinking about this and had a similar idea. We can make master the 3.x branch, and we can keep a long lived 2.x branch for security fixes, bug fixes, etc.
On 18 March 2018 at 12:18, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds fine to me. (Had the flu since Wednesday, just coming out of it.) > > Gary > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018, 11:10 Ralph Goers <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Although I would like to see us start doing 3.x releases I don’t think it > > is time to stop supporting 2.x. To that end, where applicable I think we > > should continue applying patches to both the release-2.x branch and > master. > > I don’t think we should add new features to the release-2.x branch but we > > should continue applying fixes to it. > > > > Thoughts? > > Ralph > > > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
