I’m not enough of an expert on class loaders to make a judgement call one way 
or the other. 

(Shameless plug) Every java main() method deserves http://picocli.info

> On Apr 9, 2018, at 2:32, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Any thoughts on this PR?
> 
> Gary
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <notificati...@github.com>
> Date: Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 4:00 AM
> Subject: [apache/logging-log4j2] adding log4j2.forceTCLOnly option (#140)
> To: apache/logging-log4j2 <logging-log...@noreply.github.com>
> Cc: Subscribed <subscri...@noreply.github.com>
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
> 
>  https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/140
> Commit Summary
> 
>   - adding log4j2.forceTCLOnly option
> 
> File Changes
> 
>   - *M* log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/util/
>   LoaderUtil.java
>   <https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/140/files#diff-0> (48)
>   - *A* log4j-api/src/test/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/util/
>   LoaderUtilTest.java
>   <https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/140/files#diff-1> (58)
>   - *M* src/site/xdoc/manual/configuration.xml.vm
>   <https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/140/files#diff-2> (10)
> 
> Patch Links:
> 
>   - https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/140.patch
>   - https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/140.diff
> 
> —
> You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/140>, or mute the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABIfN5qDxD9ZBKTMotzN2RBvxMEAIO87ks5tI0bmgaJpZM4RXp3M>
> .

Reply via email to