Thanks - I finally got a chance to look at the release but it still needs one 
more +1 from a PMC member.

Ralph

> On Sep 14, 2018, at 6:54 AM, Raman Gupta <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Its been 3 months since the last email on this, so I figured I'd give
> it a bump. Thanks!
> 
> Regards,
> Raman
> 
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 4:31 PM Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Looks like I added the shasum files already. Please feel free to review
>> this release. As it's the first version, I'm guessing I might need another
>> RC, but that depends on review.
>> 
>> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 12:23, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Well, let me know if you are going to before I start looking at it.
>>> 
>>> Ralph
>>> 
>>>> On Aug 6, 2018, at 9:14 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Right. I may need to make a new release candidate, though, as the hashes
>>>> were missing at first.
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, 6 Aug 2018 at 10:46, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> This vote never concluded. I still haven’t had a chance to review it
>>> but I
>>>>> have not forgotten.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ralph
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jul 14, 2018, at 12:44 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I’ll try to do this today or tomorrow.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jul 14, 2018, at 10:07 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Apologies for the delay. I've added shasums to the dist.a.o/../dev
>>>>> release
>>>>>>> area.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 16:30, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I'll add the sha files.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The example isn't using the release candidate, though. That'd be nice
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> have for smoke testing.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 9 Jul 2018 at 15:32, Raman Gupta <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> There is a simple example in the source:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-kotlin/blob/master/log4j-api-kotlin-sample/src/main/kotlin/org/apache/logging/log4j/kotlin/sample/LoggingApp.kt
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> And obviously as the primary author of this, my non-binding vote it
>>>>> +1 :-)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Raman
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 12:17 PM Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I’ll try to put together a sample project to demo how to use this.
>>>>> I’m
>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>>> sure how many of you use or are familiar with Kotlin. It would also
>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> great to get some community votes or feedback.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 14:10, Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, we have a brand new Log4j API to release, and this is the
>>>>>>>>> first
>>>>>>>>>>> release candidate to work with. Below are links to various pieces
>>> of
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> release for verification:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> GPG keys:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/logging/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Signed by Matt Sicker (748F15B2CF9BA8F024155E6ED7C92B70FA1C814D).
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Source and binary jars:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelogging-1036/
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Website staging:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://jvz.github.io/log4j-api-kotlin-staging/
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Actual release artifacts (just the sources):
>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4j/kotlin/
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Kotlin info:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://kotlinlang.org/
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Some notes about this release:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> * There is no configuration in the pom to automate the creation of
>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>> notes, rat checks, or source and binary zips/tarballs. Thus, the
>>>>>>>>>>> convenience of providing binary artifacts is only extended to the
>>>>>>>>> Maven
>>>>>>>>>>> repository version for now.
>>>>>>>>>>> * There doesn't appear to be any generated API docs.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> 


Reply via email to