I have been doing the same thing as Gary, I will prune out my duplicates 
shortly.

-ck

On Mon, Jun 3, 2019, at 10:55, Ralph Goers wrote:
> Am I sure about what? Who cares when the branches diverged? If a fix or 
> feature was introduced prior to 3.0 then it shouldn’t be listed as something 
> introduced in 3.0. Changes.xml should reflect the version the fix or feature 
> was first added. 
> 
> Please remove the duplicates from 3.0.
> 
> Ralph
> 
> > On Jun 3, 2019, at 4:14 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > Are you sure? The reason I did it like this is to track changes from when
> > the branches diverged.
> > 
> > Gary
> > 
> > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 5:45 PM Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> Gary,
> >> 
> >> In looking at the changes.xml in 3.0 it looks like you are adding
> >> notations to both the 2.x and 3.x releases. That doesn’t make any sense. A
> >> change should be noted ONLY in the release in which it was first published.
> >> Can you please go through all the actions you added to the 3.0 release and
> >> remove the duplicates?
> >> 
> >> Ralph
> >> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to