Plus the story of how we approach backward compatibility with 2.x in
3.x (e.g., renamed package, compatibility shims, etc.)

On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 at 12:19, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The stability should be fine. We have continually port all bug fixes and 
> enhancements on the release-2.x branch to master. The main goal of 3.0 is to 
> split up the core module and to make each module a valid Java Module. We have 
> not completely finished that work. Basically, that is the only thing holding 
> up its release.  Right now Log4j 3 is targeted at Java 8 but we might want to 
> consider making the base Java 9 to make our life easier as there is a whole 
> bunch of code we could dump if we did that.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Aug 21, 2019, at 10:11 AM, Gregg Donovan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Ralph, that makes sense as a way forward.
> >
> > Do you have any estimates on when 3.0 might be GA and/or an estimate of the
> > stability of the current snapshot release? We'll likely stick with our fork
> > in production until 3.0 is GA.
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:58 PM Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I think you need to try with a SNAPSHOT of 3.0.  As I mentioned in a
> >> previous email 3.0 now longer generates a .dat file but generates a Java
> >> source file that gets compiled with your source code instead. It also
> >> requires a .service file for ServiceLoader but those should be handled out
> >> of the box by shading tools.
> >>
> >> Ralph
> >>
> >>> On Aug 21, 2019, at 9:20 AM, Gregg Donovan <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello!
> >>>
> >>> I'm working on getting Etsy's custom StackdriverJsonLayout Log4J plugin
> >> to
> >>> work with our Bazel-based build system and wanted to run a few ideas by
> >> you.
> >>>
> >>> The first problem I ran into was stdout messages breaking the
> >>> PluginProcessor annotation processor when run by Bazel. My PR here[1]
> >> fixed
> >>> that for us.
> >>>
> >>> The problem we have now is with "fat jars" and the plugin cache
> >>> file
> >> (META-INF/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/config/plugins/Log4j2Plugins.dat)[2].
> >>> When Bazel builds a "deploy" jar, it combines an application's classes
> >> and
> >>> the classes of its transitive dependencies into a single "fat" JAR.
> >> During
> >>> this process it needs to intelligently combine any duplicate JAR entries
> >> it
> >>> finds.
> >>>
> >>> Right now, Bazel does not know about the plugin cache file[3], so it
> >> keeps
> >>> the first one it encounters and discards any others. So, our custom
> >>> plugin's plugin cache file is discarded in the process.[4]
> >>>
> >>> Even if Bazel knew about the plugin cache file, I don't think the binary
> >>> format is easily concatenated, due to the length header. [5]
> >>>
> >>> I have a few suggestions for fixing this that I'd like to run by you all
> >>> before submitting a patch:
> >>>
> >>> Make the .dat files concatenateable, either textually (i.e. inserting a
> >> \n
> >>> between combined files) or as binary data (i.e. no inserted bytes). This
> >>> makes the job of the build tool much easier.
> >>> There seem to be two options:
> >>> a) Move from a binary format to textual (say, tab delimited PluginEntry
> >>> fields) and combine the dat files as plain text.
> >>> If this option is chosen, we could either teach Bazel's DefaultJarEntry
> >>> filter to combine the plugin cache file textually or move it into
> >>> META-INF/services, where all files are combined as textual data.[6]
> >>>
> >>> b) Remove the length header and allow the .dat files to be combined as
> >>> binary data.
> >>> If we choose this option, we would need to teach Bazel's
> >>> DefaultJarEntryFilter to combine the plugin cache file as binary, as it
> >>> does for proto files.[7]
> >>>
> >>> What do you think? Thanks for the consideration!
> >>>
> >>> Gregg
> >>>
> >>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/pull/301
> >>> [2]:
> >>>
> >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/cd87dd40405166a4d5f6707a27cbaf7ddcf833b6/log4j-plugins/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/plugins/processor/PluginProcessor.java#L67
> >>> [3]:
> >>>
> >> https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/blob/master/src/java_tools/singlejar/java/com/google/devtools/build/singlejar/DefaultJarEntryFilter.java
> >>> [4]:
> >>>
> >> https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/blob/0d39361075b05919618720f961870d3863a726ac/src/java_tools/singlejar/java/com/google/devtools/build/singlejar/ZipEntryFilter.java#L87:L91
> >>> [5]:
> >>> -
> >>>
> >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/92d19c8da6591a706a2df9875c7e41f6fb20bd66/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/config/plugins/processor/PluginCache.java#L73
> >>> -
> >>>
> >> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/blob/92d19c8da6591a706a2df9875c7e41f6fb20bd66/log4j-core/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/core/config/plugins/processor/PluginCache.java#L101
> >>> [6]:
> >>>
> >> https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/blob/447e0f1aedb1d83feba2298b1e251b4e34ed9a70/src/java_tools/singlejar/java/com/google/devtools/build/singlejar/DefaultJarEntryFilter.java#L99:L101
> >>> [7]:
> >>>
> >> https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/blob/447e0f1aedb1d83feba2298b1e251b4e34ed9a70/src/java_tools/singlejar/java/com/google/devtools/build/singlejar/DefaultJarEntryFilter.java#L115:L117
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to