At work we have one main hurdle to update one our projects from Log4j 1 to
2: How do we migrate installed applications from Log4j1 configurations to
Log4j2.

I started to work on this a long time ago but only got the basics working
which is in Log4j2 now: The idea is to read a Log4j1 config file as is and
map it to Log4j2. If you do not use a Log4j1 (or Log4j1 "extras")
appenders, all bets are off obviously.

Gary

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 3:38 PM Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:

> At first I was concerned because on the log4j2 GitHub repo page, it
> had less than 1000 dependent users, though it turns out that stat is
> for the log4j2 parent pom, not the library. Anyways, some stats:
>
> * log4j-api about 51k:
>
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/network/dependents?package_id=UGFja2FnZS0xODAwMzE0MTQ%3D
> * log4j-core about 69k:
>
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/network/dependents?package_id=UGFja2FnZS0xODAwNzg2NjI%3D
>
> Not bad, right? But then we check some other stats:
>
> * log4j 1.x about 298k (!):
>
> https://github.com/apache/log4j/network/dependents?package_id=UGFja2FnZS0xNzk4NzY0ODE%3D
> * commons-logging about 95k:
>
> https://github.com/apache/commons-logging/network/dependents?package_id=UGFja2FnZS0xNzk5MTUzNzU%3D
> * slf4j-api about 319k (!!):
>
> https://github.com/qos-ch/slf4j/network/dependents?package_id=UGFja2FnZS0xNzk3Nzg3MDg%3D
> * logback-core about 61k:
>
> https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/network/dependents?package_id=UGFja2FnZS0xNzk5MzMyMDg%3D
> * logback-classic about 148k:
>
> https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/network/dependents?package_id=UGFja2FnZS0xNzk5MzMyNDM%3D
>
> It seems like we have room to grow marketing-wise. What do you all
> think we can do to improve that? I think trying to get some of the
> zillions of 1.x users to upgrade already would be cool. Do note that
> these stats include tons of throwaway projects, but it seems as though
> that could even be influenced. How many setup guides for various
> Java/Scala/Kotlin/Groovy frameworks default to recommending logback or
> even log4j 1.x? Or projects that try to use java.util.logging and
> suffer for it (like Jenkins hehe)?
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>

Reply via email to