Just a small inconsistency I found while refactoring. I fixed the issue I
caused already.

On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 23:15, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I don’t understand. What is the problem? As you noted it has always been
> this way.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Aug 31, 2019, at 9:03 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > The plugin category is used to distinguish that in this API, not the
> class.
> > It seems as though both use the same interface except for the one class.
> > Generic type erasure avoided this from cropping up before.
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 31, 2019 at 20:50, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Because it isn’t a PatternConverter?  Look at what it does. The
> >> newInstance method creates a DatePatternConverter. The
> >> FileDatePatternConverter and IntegerPatternConverter are both used for
> the
> >> filePattern in the rolling file appender, not for a pattern layout.
> >>
> >> Ralph
> >>
> >>> On Aug 31, 2019, at 12:35 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> FileDatePatternConverter, not DatePatternConverter.
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 at 14:35, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Ah, this is an interesting historical design decision dating back to
> >>>> the very first commit! Why exactly does DatePatternConverter _not_
> >>>> implement PatternConverter like literally every other converter class
> >>>> does?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 at 14:29, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Shit, I'm on it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, 31 Aug 2019 at 13:50, Apache Jenkins Server
> >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> See <
> >>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Log4j%202%203.x/476/display/redirect?page=changes
> >>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>
>
> --
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to