FWIW, over at Apache Commons, some components use both. Gary
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 3:42 PM Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd be on board with trying that out as an alternative to Travis. > Anything to help test PRs more reliably is great, especially without > having to overload our Jenkins instance (which is already running CI > on master and 2.x). > > On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 14:39, Volkan Yazıcı <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Given GitHub has introduced its own CI, i.e., GitHub Actions, would > > you consider migrating from Travis CI to that? In its current form, > > setup-java[1] doesn't support multiple JDKs, but I think it can be > > worked around. If the rest of the people would agree, I will create a > > ticket for that and work on it after "replacing JsonLayout with > > LogstashLayout" task, which I am currently busy right now. > > > > Advantages? Technically none, socially a more GitHub-friendly project > setup. > > > > [1] https://github.com/actions/setup-java/ > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >
