Yikes that's a good point. Any idea if animal-sniffer prevents that, too? On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 11:01, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > Compiling on Java 9 or above will break Java 8 clients if we have code that > complies against Buffer classes. > > Gary > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020, 08:49 Volkan Yazıcı <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Okay. I've created a ticket[1] for this. Note that once this is done, > > migration to GitHub Actions[2] becomes straightforward. (Marked [1] as > > a blocker for [2].) > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2771 > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-2764 > > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 2:24 PM Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > There are some compile errors if you try to use 11 for everything. If > > those > > > are fixed, we can likely use 11 for the whole build with animal sniffer > > or > > > something configured to prevent using incorrect APIs. > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 03:07 Volkan Yazıcı <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > Would somebody mind reminding me why do we need multiple JDKs for build > > > > rather than just sticking to 11 and tuning the target version whenever > > > > necessary? > > > > > > > > Kind regards. > > > > > > > -- > > > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > >
-- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
