Why would you want to do that? Most people seem to prefer getLogger() while I prefer getLogger(MyClass.class). I can’t imagine why anyone would want to dynamically construct a name like that and if they did, why wouldn’t they just using StringBuilder?
Ralph > On Mar 9, 2020, at 7:51 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All: > > Any thought for or against adding the API 'getLogger(String... name)' which > would build a hierarchical logger name. These would be equivalent: > > - getLogger("com.a.b.c") > - getLogger("com", "a", "b", "c") > > Gary
