This vote is cancelled in favor of an updated release candidate.

On Sun, 16 Feb 2020 at 13:14, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I've updated the git tag to be v12.0-rc2 and am deleting the v12.0
> tag. The v12.0 tag will be created upon a successful release vote.
>
> On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 13:01, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, I use -rcn for the tag of the Log4j releases. After the release 
> > candidate is released I then manually create a tag from the -rcn tag. 
> > Unfortunately, I don’t always remember to do that.
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> > > On Feb 9, 2020, at 11:36 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I see that log4j2 artifacts use the rcN suffix in the <tag> element of
> > > the parent pom, so it seems that I may have tagged this in the wrong
> > > order. I'll update the release process instructions.
> > >
> > > On Sun, 9 Feb 2020 at 11:44, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I don’t think we’ve copied our tags over to rel yet. I was able to force 
> > >> push the tag. I’m not entirely certain how to go about tagging this as 
> > >> rc2 but making sure all the artifacts are unchanged if the vote passes.
> > >>
> > >> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 08:45 Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> The v12.0 tag can't be right. My understanding is that each RC MUST have
> > >>> its own tag so we can track what we vote and have voted on, I had 
> > >>> forgotten
> > >>> that in RC1. Once a vote passes you can copy the tag to rel/whatever; 
> > >>> since
> > >>> "rel/" is a special place for Apache tags that is 'locked down'. Or. is 
> > >>> my
> > >>> understanding erroneous?
> > >>>
> > >>> Gary
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sat, Feb 8, 2020 at 3:01 PM Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hello all, this is a vote to release the second release candidate of
> > >>>> Log4j Scala API 12.0. This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours
> > >>>> and requires at least 3 +1 votes and more +1 votes than -1 votes.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> == Links
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Staging repository:
> > >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelogging-1052
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Staging artifacts:
> > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/logging/log4j/scala/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Site preview:
> > >>>> https://jvz.github.io/log4j-scala-site/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Repository:
> > >>>> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=logging-log4j-scala.git
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Tag:
> > >>>> v12.0
> > >>>>
> > >>>> You may download all the Maven artifacts by executing:
> > >>>> wget -e robots=off --cut-dirs=7 -nH -r -p -np --no-check-certificate
> > >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachelogging-1052
> > >>>>
> > >>>> == ChangeLog
> > >>>>
> > >>>> New Features::
> > >>>> LOG4J2-1882::: Migrate log4j-api-scala to sbt.
> > >>>> LOG4J2-2303::: Add release distribution script.
> > >>>> LOG4J2-2295::: Add OSGi metadata to release jars.
> > >>>> LOG4J2-2294::: Add release audit information to build.
> > >>>> LOG4J2-2298::: Add changelog to site.
> > >>>> LOG4J2-2293::: Add required license files to sbt output artifacts.
> > >>>> LOG4J2-2296::: Add sbt-site plugin and website configuration.
> > >>>> LOG4J2-2291::: Add Jenkins pipeline for sbt build.
> > >>>> LOG4J2-2668::: Add support for Scala 2.13.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Changes::
> > >>>> LOG4J2-2309::: Update Log4j Scala API for 2.13 from 2.13.0-M2 to 
> > >>>> 2.13.0-M3.
> > >>>> LOG4J2-2290::: Update Log4j from 2.9.1 to 2.11.0.
> > >>>> LOG4J2-1995::: Update log4j-api-scala_2.11 from Scala 2.11.8 to 
> > >>>> 2.11.11.
> > >>>> LOG4J2-1996::: Update log4j-api-scala_2.12 from Scala 2.12.1 to 2.12.3.
> > >>>> LOG4J2-2115::: Update Log4j dependency from 2.8.1 to 2.9.1.
> > >>>> LOG4J2-2116::: Update log4j-api-scala_2.12 from Scala 2.12.3 to 2.12.4.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>



-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to