The changes looked good to me so I went ahead and merged them to the asf-site branch so now they are on the live site.
Ralph > On Sep 4, 2020, at 11:51 PM, Davyd McColl <dav...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Ralph > > Sorry for wasting your time. I stupidly fixed up some of the the site in the > SVN tree last time, and then re-generated before commiting to the github > site, so it was still in a 1/2 state and I guess I was looking at the wrong > thing in my browser when I checked ): > > I've updated again and validated that the *2.0.9* links point at the right > place; pushed to asf-staging & checked on > http://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net. > > -d > On 2020/09/05 08:12:19, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote: > OK, I’ve looked at http://logging.staged.apache.org/log4net. The download > page still doesn’t look correct. The heading still says 2.0.8 although the > source zip is 2.0.9 as it should be. The binary artifacts display as 2.0.8 > but the links point to 2.0.9. Log4j controls all of this with a variable in > the pom.xml file. > > Ralph > > >> On Sep 2, 2020, at 11:01 PM, Davyd McColl wrote: >> >> Ralph, I've updated apache/logging-log4net-site#asf-staging with the latest >> build artifacts from the apache/logging-log4net repo, please validate when >> you have time. >> >> Matt, I don't think I have access to push binary artifacts -- and, if I do, >> I don't know where (I'm quite sure Ralph did that for me last time, tho I'll >> need to understand better at some point so as to be less of a PITA); at >> least I understand now that the SVN repo for the logging site is deprecated >> and the new place I should be putting generated site material is as above >> (apache/logging-log4net-site#asf-staging) >> >> -d >> >> >> On 2020/09/02 17:01:15, Matt Sicker wrote: >> Subversion is still used for publishing release artifacts. The >> previous Subversion-based system for publishing the website itself has >> been migrated to git. Without using git-lfs, I don't see us migrating >> from svn to git for release distribution for quite some time (svn >> seems better suited for archiving binary files like that). >> > >
