Yes, this is the intent of LOG4J2-2986:
"stackTrace": {
"stringified": true, "truncatedStringSuffix": ">",
"truncationPointStrings": ["at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service"]}
That snippet from the PR doesn't seem to match your documentation grammar
"truncationPointStrings" vs "truncationPointMatcherStrings":
stringified = "stringified" -> booleantruncatedStringSuffix
= "truncatedStringSuffix" -> stringtruncationPointMatcherStrings =
"truncationPointMatcherStrings" -> string[]truncationPointMatcherRegexes =
"truncationPointMatcherRegexes" -> string[]
I just finished up with a PR on my ticket too. Since I'm dealing with frames I
decided to build on the existing "filters" name for packages and name it
"filters.startFrames":
filters.startFrames(javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service)
I don't support regexes (yet?)
Do you think the name/syntax should match across features or is the Json layout
unique enough that having two names (truncationPoint*, startFrames) for the
same concept is ok?
On Friday, January 15, 2021, 10:59:26 AM EST, Volkan Yazıcı
<volkan.yaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I have cloned Ron's LOG4J2-2986 (truncation of stack traces after a matching
point) for JSON template layout in LOG4J2-2993 and created a PR. I would
appreciate it if somebody can review the changes, in particular, how matching
against the provided regexes are performed via grouping.
@Ron, I will appreciate it if you can confirm that the implemented feature set
is indeed what you were asking for.
Kind regards.
P.S. @Remko Popma, I still cannot add you as a reviewer to GitHub PRs.
