That sounds like we're in agreement then.  I'll go put in a merge
request for that sometime in the next few weeks(against a new
development branch) to track it.  My thought is that all of these
new(and breaking changes) will be in a separate branch(log4cxx-next?)
so as to not mess with master, as there are a number of fixes that
will break things.

-Robert Middleton

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 9:06 AM Thorsten Schöning <tschoen...@am-soft.de> wrote:
>
> Guten Tag Robert Middleton,
> am Samstag, 25. September 2021 um 03:49 schrieben Sie:
>
> > I've been working on ABI compliance for log4cxx lately(LOGCXX-516),
> > and I'm running across a few classes that have to do with sending log
> > messages as Java serialized messages.  Since we've removed the ability
> > to receive these messages through Chainsaw, and due to Java's known
> > security issues with object deserialization, is there any reason in
> > keeping this feature around?
>
> I have the feeling that textual based log messages are preferred in
> most cases and formats like JSON(/XML) seem more interoparable and
> accepted these days. So if it makes anything easier, I vote for
> removing as well.
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>
> Thorsten Schöning
>
> --
> AM-SoFT IT-Service - Bitstore Hameln GmbH
> Mitglied der Bitstore Gruppe - Ihr Full-Service-Dienstleister für IT und TK
>
> E-Mail: thorsten.schoen...@am-soft.de
> Web:    http://www.AM-SoFT.de/
>
> Tel:   05151-  9468- 0
> Tel:   05151-  9468-55
> Fax:   05151-  9468-88
> Mobil:  0178-8 9468-04
>
> AM-SoFT IT-Service - Bitstore Hameln GmbH, Brandenburger Str. 7c, 31789 Hameln
> AG Hannover HRB 221853 - Geschäftsführer: Janine Galonska
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to