Sure, I can do that next time. Gary
On Thu, Dec 9, 2021, 00:17 Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > Why not have separate <action> entries for each change instead of this one > big thingy: > > <action dev="ggregory" type="update"> > - org.eclipse.persistence:javax.persistence ............. 2.1.1 -> > 2.2.1 > - org.eclipse.persistence:org.eclipse.persistence.jpa ... 2.6.5 -> > 2.6.9 > - org.fusesource.jansi:jansi ............................ 2.3.1 -> > 2.3.2 > - net.javacrumbs.json-unit:json-unit .................. 2.24.0 -> > 2.25.0 > - org.liquibase:liquibase-core .......................... 3.5.3 -> > 3.5.5 > - org.springframework:spring-aop ........................ 5.3.3 -> > 5.3.5 > - org.springframework:spring-beans ...................... 5.3.3 -> > 5.3.5 > - org.springframework:spring-context .................... 5.3.3 -> > 5.3.5 > - org.springframework:spring-context-support ............ 5.3.3 -> > 5.3.5 > - org.springframework:spring-core ....................... 5.3.3 -> > 5.3.5 > - org.springframework:spring-expression ................. 5.3.3 -> > 5.3.5 > - org.springframework:spring-oxm ........................ 5.3.3 -> > 5.3.5 > - org.springframework:spring-test ....................... 5.3.3 -> > 5.3.5 > - org.springframework:spring-web ........................ 5.3.3 -> > 5.3.5 > - org.springframework:spring-webmvc ..................... 5.3.3 -> > 5.3.5 > - org.tukaani:xz ............................................ 1.8 -> > 1.9 > </action> > > On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 11:09 PM Apache <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I tried that. Somehow the whole description got removed. Even if that > > worked the release notes would look terrible. > > > > Ralph. > > > > > On Dec 8, 2021, at 5:23 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > If you refer to > > > > https://logging.staged.apache.org/log4j/2.x/changes-report.html#a2.15.0 > > I'm > > > not sure what we can do unless there is special sauce to use in > > > changes.xml. Are we supposed to use HTML in a changes.xml entry? That > > would > > > be simple enough. > > > > > > Gary > > > > > >> On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 5:05 PM Ralph Goers < > [email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> Gary, > > >> > > >> Please review the manual changes for 2.15.0 on the staging web site. > The > > >> last item is yours from > > >> upgrading a bunch of dependency versions. > > >> > > >> I spent a bunch of time yesterday trying to figure out how to make > that > > >> pretty and finally gave up. > > >> It requires knowing now the changes plugin passes data to Doxia and > what > > >> Doxia is going to do to > > >> render it. If you look at > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/maven-changes-plugin/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/changes/ChangesReportGenerator.java > > >> in the constructAction methodyou will see that it calls sink.text() > for > > >> the description. I can only guess > > >> it is using Doxia’s XHTML Sink which just appends the data to a > > >> StringBuffer. > > >> > > >> Interestingly, it doesn’t look to bad when the announcement goal is > run, > > >> but that is only because the > > >> target is a Markdown file so it sort of looks ok, although Markdown > > seems > > >> to treat it as one large code block. > > >> > > >> Bottom line - Unless you can figure out how to get these to properly > > >> format entries like this will > > >> continue to be a mess in the future. I know we have had at least one > > like > > >> it in the past. > > >> > > >> Ralph > > >> > > > > > > >
