Sorry, I forgot to vote explicitly. I'd be +1 on the git repo migration, but I was also iffy on enabling issues there.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 1:23 PM Vladimir Sitnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ralph>I have no problem doing stuff on GitHub > > Bingo! > That is what I said earlier. > > It is really really demotivating that "PMC is not against". > I suggested the move. Neither Ralph nor Matt welcomed the change with +1. > > At no time do I request you to perform the Git migration. > At no time do I request you to refactor the build scripts. > Yet you do ask A LOT before you even try doing something. > > That is exactly the reason I believe it is way less time consuming for all > the parties to re-incubate 1.x > rather than keep all those "But someone needs to migrate". > > Ralph>But someone needs to migrate it from SVN and I don’t have the time > for that > > I can do that just fine. Would you just approve the move? > Is it really that hard to respond with +1 on move to Git thread? > What I get is -1(binding), and irrelevant comments like "someone needs to > migrate". > Thank you. I know someone needs to do that. > > The Git repository with the full log4j 1.x history already exists. > I highlighted it on a "[VOTE] Move log4j 1.x from SVN to Git" thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/0z34x9536mtr2z98m4s4dpqglzvjhjfq > > Vladimir
