The Log4j1 project is EOL, and assuming that it remains EOL and we are only
doing security patches, I vote in favor of this repo change, to
facilitate making such security patches.
+1

I agree we need to get consensus on the scope of any Log4j1 work.

On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 8:53 AM Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:

> I tend to agree here. Even if we go ahead with the repo rename, we’ll
> still need some consensus on the scope of this work.
> --
> Matt Sicker
>
> > On Dec 23, 2021, at 17:11, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > hi
> >
> > at the moment I am -1 too, mostly for the reasons Gary mentioned.
> > Most important is that we don't have a clear goal on what we are trying
> to achieve here. We should be very explicit of why we are doing what.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Christian
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2021, at 22:50, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> -1
> >> We just created logging-log4j1 and converted the SVN repo into it, let's
> >> stick to that. I even made a commit ;-)
> >> I claim it is a good thing to start with a new repo because it creates a
> >> tiny bit of friction, for a project that is still End-of-Life after all.
> >> Even if it is a bit of friction to bring in old stuff from the old repo,
> >> this would provide a kind of effort/value filter.
> >> The concurrent consensus I see on the PMC is to fix the one listed CVE
> on
> >> our site plus other fixes in the style of the recent 2.x fixes.
> >> Bringing in all of the cruft from the old repo will give the wrong
> >> impression that we actually might be merging this or that random fix and
> >> feature. Which I claim is not the goal here.
> >>
> >> I feel we might need an addendum or a subsequent VOTE with a stated
> goal or
> >> charter for this repo to only provide CVE fixes (see above). Projects
> >> usually have a charter, not components I do not think, but I think we
> >> should have one here and put it in front and center in the README.md so
> we
> >> can manage expectations for people finding the repo on GitHub.
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >> On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 4:35 PM Ralph Goers <[email protected]
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> In https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-22654 Chris Lambertus
> has
> >>> recommended that we can divorce
> >>> the read-only SVN repo from https://github.com/apache/log4j. However,
> it
> >>> will not be able to keep the same
> >>> name as all Git repos owned by the logging project must start with
> >>> “logging-“.
> >>>
> >>> So this vote is to:
> >>> 1. Delete the apache/logging-log4j1 repo I created last night.
> >>> 2. Divorce the apache/log4j repo from SVN.
> >>> 3. Rename apache/log4j to apache/logging-log4j1.
> >>> 4. Create a branch named “main” from the v1_2_17 tag.
> >>> 5. Make main the default branch in GitHub.
> >>>
> >>> While all votes are welcome Infra needs consensus from the PMC on this
> >>> vote so the result will separate
> >>> binding from non-binding votes.
> >>>
> >>> Ralph
> >>>
> >>> PS - I’ve separated this from the previous vote thread since it was
> mostly
> >>> discussion. If you want to discuss
> >>> this please prefix the subject with [DISCUSS]
>
>

Reply via email to